Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a provisional attachment of a bank account under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ceases to have effect after the expiry of one year from the date of the attachment order, and whether the bank account could continue to remain blocked in the absence of any fresh attachment order.
Analysis: The attachment was made under section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The statutory position under section 83(2) is that a provisional attachment ceases to have effect after the expiry of one year from the date of the order. It was not disputed that the attachment order was issued on 27-01-2022 and that no fresh attachment order was passed thereafter. On that basis, the continued restraint on the bank account had no legal foundation.
Conclusion: The provisional attachment had ceased to operate, and the bank account could not remain embargoed on the basis of the expired attachment order.
Ratio Decidendi: A provisional attachment under section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 automatically lapses on expiry of the statutory period and cannot be continued without a fresh valid order.