Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on inputs used in manufacture of goods cleared under bond without payment of duty under the applicable notification was admissible, and whether such clearances attracted Rule 57C of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 so as to deny credit.
Analysis: The Court accepted the Tribunal's view that a clearance under bond without payment of duty pursuant to the notification issued under Rule 13 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is not the same as a clearance of goods that are wholly exempt from duty or chargeable to nil rate of duty. On that basis, the condition for invoking Rule 57C was not satisfied. The Court further found no error in the Tribunal's reliance on the line of decisions treating such bonded clearances as distinct from exempt or nil-rated goods, and held that the assessee remained entitled to Modvat credit on the inputs.
Conclusion: The question was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee; no referable question of law arose.