Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 3(5B) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 applies to a mere provision or write-down made in respect of slow-moving or non-moving inventory, and whether the resulting demand and penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The appellant had made only a provision for partial reduction in the value of inventory in the books of account, while the goods remained in stock, continued to be usable, and were eventually consumed in manufacture. The applicable rule operates only when the value of inputs or capital goods is written off fully or partially, or when a specific provision to write off is made. A mere accounting provision for slow-moving inventory, without an actual write-off of the inventory from the books or proof that the goods had ceased to remain usable or had been removed from the factory, does not satisfy the statutory condition. The demand was therefore based on an incorrect invocation of the rule, and the penalty could not survive once the credit reversal itself was unsustainable.
Conclusion: Rule 3(5B) was held inapplicable to the facts, the demand was held unsustainable, and the penalty was also set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: A provision for slow-moving or non-moving inventory is not equivalent to a write-off of inputs or capital goods, and Cenvat credit reversal under Rule 3(5B) arises only upon an actual or specifically provided write-off in the books of account.