1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeals Dismissed as Substantial Questions of Law Previously Addressed in Earlier Orders</h1> The Bombay HC, with judges K.R. Shriram and N.J. Jamadar, disposed of the appeals, as the substantial questions of law raised by the Appellant, ... Bogus purchases - bogus accommodation bills - estimation of income - hawala transactions from certain parties who were only providing accommodation sale bills. HED THAT:- Substantial questions of law are already covered by the order passed by this Court [2019 (2) TMI 1632 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] and [2019 (7) TMI 838 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT]. Therefore both the Appeals be disposed. The Bombay High Court, with judges K.R. Shriram and N. J. Jamadar, heard the case with Mr. Ashok Kotangle representing the Appellant and Mr. R.S. Padvekar representing the Respondent. Mr. Kotangale argued that the substantial questions of law raised were already addressed in previous court orders. As a result, both appeals were disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
