Appeals Dismissed as Substantial Questions of Law Previously Addressed in Earlier Orders The Bombay HC, with judges K.R. Shriram and N.J. Jamadar, disposed of the appeals, as the substantial questions of law raised by the Appellant, ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeals Dismissed as Substantial Questions of Law Previously Addressed in Earlier Orders
The Bombay HC, with judges K.R. Shriram and N.J. Jamadar, disposed of the appeals, as the substantial questions of law raised by the Appellant, represented by Mr. Ashok Kotangle, were already addressed in previous court orders.
The Bombay High Court, with judges K.R. Shriram and N. J. Jamadar, heard the case with Mr. Ashok Kotangle representing the Appellant and Mr. R.S. Padvekar representing the Respondent. Mr. Kotangale argued that the substantial questions of law raised were already addressed in previous court orders. As a result, both appeals were disposed of accordingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.