1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Revenue's Appeal Dismissed: Assessee Retains Charitable Status Under Income Tax Act Sections 11 & 260A, No Substantial Law Question Found.</h1> The Delhi HC dismissed the Revenue's appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, affirming the assessee's entitlement to claim charitable ... Exemption u/s 11 - opinion of the CIT(A) that the assessee was entitled to claim charitable status u/s 11 - ITAT also noted that the question of law urged by the Revenue in that previous year was a subject matter of an appeal that was rejected by this Court. HELD THAT:- In ITA [2015 (10) TMI 2865 - DELHI HIGH COURT] pertaining to AY 1994-95, whereto the issue related to the benefit of Section 11 claimed by the assessee revenueβs appeal for AY 1993-94, involving the same question, was dismissed. In that view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed. The question is answered against the Revenue. The Delhi High Court, in a judgment regarding an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, upheld the assessee's entitlement to claim charitable status under Section 11. The court referenced its previous decisions for AY 2009-10 and noted that similar appeals by the Revenue had been dismissed in the past. As a result, the court dismissed the current appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose based on the previous orders.