Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the miscellaneous application seeking rectification or recall of the Tribunal's earlier order was barred by limitation under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The application was filed beyond six months from the end of the month in which the order was passed. The relevant limitation period was treated as commencing from the date on which the order came to the assessee's knowledge, namely the date of receipt of the order. On that basis, the filing was still beyond the prescribed period. The Tribunal further noted that it had no jurisdiction to condone delay in a miscellaneous application under section 254(2).
Conclusion: The miscellaneous application was held to be time-barred and not maintainable.