Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to bail in view of the requirements of continuing unlawful activity, organised crime and organised crime syndicate under the special statute, and whether the statutory bail restrictions were satisfied.
Analysis: The statutory scheme was applied by examining whether the allegations and material disclosed the ingredients of continuing unlawful activity, organised crime, and membership of an organised crime syndicate, together with the requirement of mens rea. It was held that at the bail stage the Court is not required to conduct a mini trial or reach a positive finding of innocence, but must assess the matter on broad probabilities and prima facie material. The special bail restriction was considered in the light of the constitutional guarantee of personal liberty, and the material was found insufficient at this stage to justify continued detention.
Conclusion: The applicant was found entitled to bail.
Final Conclusion: The bail application was allowed and the applicant was ordered to be released on bail on specified conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: For bail under the special organised-crime statute, the Court must evaluate prima facie material on broad probabilities and cannot insist on a conclusive finding of guilt or innocence at the pre-trial stage; where the foundational ingredients are not established to that standard, bail may be granted despite the statutory restriction.