Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, arrested for offences under the Companies Act, 2013, was entitled to bail.
Analysis: The allegations related to fraudulent accounting, alleged diversion of funds, and writing off stock as wastage over a period of years. The Court noted the prosecution case that the petitioner had been associated with the company's finance and accounts, and considered the statutory framework governing fraud and the role of persons connected with company management. The Court also took into account the period of custody already undergone since arrest and the overall circumstances of the case. On that basis, the Court found it appropriate to grant bail, subject to conditions.
Conclusion: The petitioner was granted bail.