Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 can be sustained when the assessee's reply and documents, though filed after the time mentioned in the notice under Section 148A(b), were filed before the order and were not considered.
Analysis: Section 148A(c) requires the Assessing Officer to consider the reply furnished, if any, in response to the notice under Section 148A(b), and does not add a further condition that the reply must be filed only within the time allowed in the notice. Since the reply was filed before the order under Section 148A(d), the observation that no reply had been filed at all was factually incorrect. The impugned order proceeded on an erroneous premise and the reply ought to have been considered before concluding the proceedings.
Conclusion: The challenge succeeded on this limited ground. The order under Section 148A(d), the consequential notice under Section 148, the assessment order, and the connected demand and penalty notices were quashed, with liberty to the assessee to file further reply or documents and for fresh consideration thereafter.