Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim was barred by limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 in view of the explanation inserted on 11-5-2007.
Analysis: The refund claim was filed after the assessee had received a favourable appellate order. The explanation to Section 11B, inserted on 11-5-2007, made the date of the favourable order the relevant date for filing the refund claim within one year. Since the favourable order was passed after the insertion of the explanation and the refund claim was filed beyond one year from that date, the claim was beyond the prescribed limitation. The cited precedent was held to be inapplicable on its facts.
Conclusion: The refund claim was barred by limitation and was rightly rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the explanation to Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies, the relevant date for a refund claim based on a favourable appellate order is the date of that order, and the claim must be filed within the prescribed period of one year.