Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid when the same issue had been queried during the original assessment under Section 143(3) and the assessee had responded to it.
Analysis: The assessment records showed that the Assessing Officer had specifically examined the provision for warranty during the original assessment proceedings. A query on that very issue had been raised, information had been called for, and a reply had been furnished. In such circumstances, the issue must be treated as having been considered in the original assessment, even if the assessment order did not expressly discuss it. Reopening on the same material amounted to a change of opinion, and such change cannot furnish the requisite reason to believe that income had escaped assessment.
Conclusion: The reassessment notice was unsustainable and was quashed. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Court held that reassessment cannot be initiated merely because the Assessing Officer later adopts a different view on an issue already examined in the original assessment proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a specific query on an issue is raised in the original assessment and the assessee responds, reassessment on the same issue is impermissible if it is founded only on a change of opinion.