Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 59(B) of the Rajasthan Stamp Rules, 1955 was ultra vires Section 47A of the Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1899.
Analysis: Section 47A is the substantive provision empowering the registering officer to refer an instrument to the Collector where the market value of immovable property is not truly set forth. Rule 59(B), being delegated legislation, could be read consistently with that provision by treating the district-level committee assessment or circle rate as a relevant benchmark, without making it conclusive in every case. The rule could not be construed so as to prevent the registering officer from referring a matter to the Collector where he prima facie believes that the true market value is higher than the circle rate. The two provisions were therefore capable of being reconciled by harmonious construction, and the rule did not render the statutory power nugatory.
Conclusion: Rule 59(B) was not ultra vires Section 47A, and the registering officer retained power to make a reference to the Collector in an appropriate case.
Ratio Decidendi: Delegated legislation must be construed, where possible, so as to operate consistently with the parent statute, and a market-rate rule cannot exclude the statutory power of reference where the registering officer has reason to believe the property value is understated.