Regular bail denied despite FIR delay where prima facie evidence and risk of tampering justified continued custody

Regular bail may be refused where the prosecution material discloses a prima facie case, the allegations are serious, and there is a real risk of witness intimidation or evidence tampering. Delay in lodging the FIR is not necessarily fatal if the surrounding conduct and immediate post-incident actions support the prosecution version. The court noted circumstances suggesting possible concealment of material evidence, including selective CCTV footage, an unexamined internal report, and issues concerning the seized mobile phone. In those circumstances, the accused's position and the need to protect the integrity of the investigation justified rejection of bail at that stage.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to regular bail in the alleged assault case, having regard to the delay in lodging the FIR, the nature of the injuries, the possibility of false implication, and the apprehension of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.

Analysis: The application was considered on the settled bail factors, including the prima facie material, seriousness of the allegations, severity of the accusation, the position and influence of the accused, and the likelihood of witness intimidation or evidence tampering. The delay in registration of the FIR was not treated as fatal in the peculiar facts, as the complainant's conduct immediately after the incident and the alleged calling of emergency assistance supported the prosecution version. The Court also noted circumstances suggesting possible concealment of material evidence, including selective CCTV footage, the uninvestigated internal report, and the formatting of the seized mobile phone. In view of the accused's position and the risk to the integrity of the investigation, release on bail was found unwarranted at that stage.

Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to regular bail and the application was rejected.

Ratio Decidendi: In considering regular bail, where the accusations are , the prosecution material indicates a prima facie case, and there is a real apprehension of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, bail may be refused despite delay in lodging the FIR.

---