Abetment of suicide needs direct instigation or aid; cruelty conviction upheld on sustained harassment evidence.

Abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC requires proof of instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid under Section 107; general harassment or remote conduct is insufficient, and the conviction was set aside because no direct or proximate act linking the appellant to the suicide was proved. Cruelty under Section 498A IPC was established on accepted evidence of sustained mental and physical harassment after a dispute over a proposed second marriage, and that conviction was upheld.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the conviction for abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code was sustainable on the evidence; (ii) Whether the conviction for cruelty under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code was liable to be interfered with.

Issue (i): Whether the conviction for abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code was sustainable on the evidence.

Analysis: Abetment of suicide requires proof of instigation, conspiracy or intentional aid within the meaning of Section 107 of the Indian Penal Code. Mere harassment or domestic discord, without direct or proximate acts of incitement or facilitation close to the occurrence, is insufficient to sustain a conviction under Section 306. On the facts found by the courts below, the alleged incident of torture immediately preceding the death was disbelieved, and the earlier bringing of the second woman to the house was too remote to amount to instigation or intentional aid. The evidence did not show any active role by the appellant in provoking or facilitating the suicide.

Conclusion: The conviction under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code was not sustainable and was set aside in favour of the appellant.

Issue (ii): Whether the conviction for cruelty under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code was liable to be interfered with.

Analysis: Cruelty under Section 498A encompasses conduct that subjects a woman to mental or physical cruelty as statutorily defined. The evidence accepted by the courts below showed a sustained course of cruelty after the appellant sought permission for a second marriage and was refused, followed by repeated harassment and torture of the deceased. The material on record was sufficient to establish cruelty, and no ground was made out to disturb the concurrent finding on this charge.

Conclusion: The conviction under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code was upheld against the appellant.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the extent of setting aside the conviction for abetment of suicide, while the conviction for cruelty was maintained and the remaining sentence on that count was left undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: A conviction for abetment of suicide cannot rest on general allegations of harassment or remote conduct; there must be proof of a direct or proximate act of instigation or intentional aid, whereas cruelty under Section 498A may be established on evidence of sustained mental or physical harassment.

---