Abetment of suicide requires clear instigation or intentional aid; absent credible material, the charge cannot stand.

Abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC requires credible material showing clear mens rea and a positive act of instigation or intentional aid with a proximate nexus to the suicide. Mere allegations, ordinary discord, humiliation, or the deceased's hypersensitivity to routine conflict are insufficient. The suicide note did not attribute any role to the accused, and the record disclosed no instigation, intentional aid, or direct causal link. The charge was therefore unsustainable and was rightly quashed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the material on record, including the suicide note, disclosed the ingredients of abetment so as to justify framing and sustaining a charge under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the appellant.

Analysis: Abetment of suicide requires a clear mental element and an active or direct act of instigation, intentional aid, or conduct showing a deliberate push towards suicide. Mere allegations, ordinary discord, humiliation, or a deceased person's hypersensitivity to routine conflict do not by themselves establish the statutory ingredients. The suicide note did not attribute any role to the appellant, and the record did not disclose credible material showing instigation, intentional aid, or a proximate causal link between the appellant's conduct and the suicide.

Conclusion: The charge under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the appellant was unsustainable and was rightly quashed.

Ratio Decidendi: A person cannot be put to trial for abetment of suicide unless the record discloses credible material showing a clear mens rea and a positive act of instigation or intentional aid having a proximate nexus with the suicide.

---