Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Court Directs 5% Net Profit Rate for Labor Cooperative Society, Dismisses Other Issues u/s 80P(2)(vi.</h1> The court partially allowed the appeal by directing the Assessing Officer (AO) to apply a 5% net profit rate instead of the 15% initially estimated, ... Estimation of income @ 15% of the contract receipts - adopting a higher rate of percentage, especially in the case of the assessee where he was executing the repairs of roads/buildings of the Government - HELD THAT:- Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in CIT vs. Target Construction Co. Ltd.[2014 (9) TMI 57 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] while adjudicating the case of road contractors had laid down the proposition that the net profit rate of 5% as estimated by the ITAT should be applied. Admittedly, when an estimation has to be made in the hands of any of the assessee, fair estimate should be made keeping in mind the nature of activity carried on by the said person and also taking into consideration the past or the future results shown by the assessee in this regard. There is no merit in estimating the net profit in the case of the assessee @ 15% especially in view of the past and future results shown by the assessee from year to year where the assessee is an association of labourers who, in turn, were taking up the Government contract for the repair of roads/buildings. AO is directed to compute the income in the hands of the assessee by applying net profit of 5%. The assessee is not entitled the claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Act - Appeal of the assessee is allowed. 1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDEREDThe judgment addresses the following core legal issues:Whether the CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance of deduction claimed by the appellant society under section 80P(2)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Whether the CIT(A) erred in upholding the rejection of the appellant's book results and confirming the estimation of net profit at 15% of contract receipts.Whether the appellant society, being a labor cooperative society, is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Act.Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating that all laborers are members of the appellant society.2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSISIssue 1: Disallowance of Deduction under Section 80P(2)(vi)Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: Section 80P(2)(vi) of the Income-tax Act provides deductions for cooperative societies engaged in certain activities. The appellant claimed this deduction as a labor cooperative society.Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The appellant did not press this issue, and thus, it was dismissed as not pressed.Key Evidence and Findings: The appellant accepted the denial of the deduction under section 80P(2).Application of Law to Facts: Since the appellant did not pursue this issue, the court did not delve into a detailed analysis.Treatment of Competing Arguments: No competing arguments were considered as the issue was not pressed.Conclusions: The court accepted the appellant's stance and dismissed the issue as not pressed.Issue 2: Estimation of Net Profit at 15%Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The estimation of income by the Assessing Officer (AO) was based on rejecting the books of account and applying a net profit rate of 15% on contract receipts.Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The court found that the estimation of a 15% net profit rate was not justified, especially considering the appellant's historical and future profit rates, which were significantly lower.Key Evidence and Findings: The appellant's historical net profit rates ranged from 0.29% to 0.67%, and the AO's estimation of 15% was inconsistent with these figures. The court also considered similar cases of other labor cooperative societies.Application of Law to Facts: The court applied the principle that fair estimation should consider the nature of the appellant's activities and historical results. It referenced the Allahabad High Court's decision in CIT vs. Target Construction Co. Ltd., which suggested a 5% net profit rate for similar activities.Treatment of Competing Arguments: The appellant argued against the high estimation, while the Revenue supported the AO's decision. The court sided with the appellant, emphasizing fairness and consistency with past results.Conclusions: The court directed the AO to compute the appellant's income using a 5% net profit rate instead of 15%.Issue 3: Eligibility for Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(vi)Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The appellant claimed eligibility for deductions under section 80P(2)(a)(vi) as a labor cooperative society.Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The appellant did not press this issue, leading to its dismissal.Key Evidence and Findings: The court noted the appellant's acceptance of the denial of this deduction.Application of Law to Facts: The lack of pursuit of this issue by the appellant resulted in no detailed application of law.Treatment of Competing Arguments: No arguments were considered since the issue was not pressed.Conclusions: The issue was dismissed as not pressed.Issue 4: Membership of Laborers in the SocietyRelevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The appellant argued that all laborers were members of the cooperative society, impacting the deduction eligibility.Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: This issue was not pressed by the appellant and was consequently dismissed.Key Evidence and Findings: The court acknowledged the appellant's acceptance of the CIT(A)'s decision.Application of Law to Facts: No detailed application was necessary due to the lack of pursuit.Treatment of Competing Arguments: The court did not consider competing arguments as the issue was not pressed.Conclusions: The issue was dismissed as not pressed.3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGSPreserve Verbatim Quotes of Crucial Legal Reasoning: 'There is no merit in estimating the net profit in the case of the assessee @ 15% especially in view of the past and future results shown by the assessee from year to year where the assessee is an association of laborers who, in turn, were taking up the Government contract for the repair of roads/buildings.'Core Principles Established: The estimation of income should be fair and consistent with historical performance and the nature of the business. A net profit rate of 5% is deemed appropriate for labor cooperative societies engaged in government contract work.Final Determinations on Each Issue: The appeal was allowed in part, with the court directing the AO to apply a 5% net profit rate instead of 15%. The other issues were dismissed as not pressed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found