Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the scheme of amalgamation as approved by the NCLT in respect of four private limited transferee companies with the transferor company should be confirmed despite the NCLAT having set aside the NCLT order.
Analysis: The Court examined the limited contested scope the scheme as it relates only to four private limited companies in light of the NCLT approval and the NCLAT's interference. The statutory threshold for a person to be treated as aggrieved under Section 230(4) was noted as relevant to the competence to object to the scheme. The record shows that the challenged portion concerns private limited companies for which requisite internal approvals existed and the objector did not have shareholding or locus affecting those entities. The Court considered the propriety of NCLAT's refusal to limit its interference and whether the NCLT's approval in respect of the four private companies should be sustained.
Conclusion: The scheme of amalgamation as approved by the NCLT is confirmed in respect of the four private limited transferee companies; the NCLAT order insofar as it set aside that approval is set aside. The decision is in favour of the appellant.