Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent institution was entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the basis that it was wholly or substantially financed by the Government, having regard to the land, infrastructure and funds granted over earlier years.
Analysis: The institution existed only for educational purposes and not for private benefit. It was controlled by a Board appointed by the Government. The Government of Karnataka had granted substantial land and the institution had been built up with funds granted by the State Government and the University Grants Commission over the relevant period. On that basis, the financing received was treated as substantial government financing for the purpose of the exemption provision.
Conclusion: The respondent was entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Ratio Decidendi: For purposes of section 10(23C)(iiiab), substantial government financing may be established by considering the overall governmental support and assistance received by an educational institution, including land, infrastructure and grants received over the relevant period.