Anti-profiteering report found incomplete; matter remanded for fresh investigation after unresolved factual and accounting discrepancies.

The anti-profiteering report was found incomplete because the saleable area figures were discrepant, the treatment of flats relatable to landowners remained unclear, and bifurcated CENVAT/ITC figures for rehab and sale buildings were not provided. Supporting documents for homebuyers and consideration received were also not fully produced or verified. As a result, the report could not sustain a final profiteering determination and the matter was remanded for reinvestigation. The DGAP was directed to obtain the missing particulars, reconcile the figures, and submit a complete report.

---

---

Issues: Whether the DGAP report on alleged profiteering under the anti-profiteering regime was incomplete and required further investigation, and whether the matter should be remanded to the DGAP for a fresh report.

Analysis: The record showed discrepancies in the saleable area figures used in the report, uncertainty regarding profiteering on flats relatable to landowners, and an absence of bifurcated CENVAT/ITC figures for rehab and sale buildings. The Commission also noted that complete supporting documents for homebuyers and consideration received had not been produced or verified. In these circumstances, the report was treated as incomplete and incapable of supporting a final determination on profiteering.

Conclusion: The matter was sent back for reinvestigation, and the DGAP was directed to obtain the missing particulars, reconcile the figures, and submit a complete report.

Final Conclusion: No final finding on the quantified profiteering demand was rendered, and the proceedings were returned for fresh examination on the unresolved factual and accounting issues.

---