Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of service tax paid on ocean freight after 01.07.2017 could be allowed as refund of cenvat credit under section 142(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The refund claim was rejected on the premise that service tax was paid after the GST regime commenced and, therefore, no cenvat credit was admissible. The payment, however, related to a period prior to 01.07.2017 when such credit was otherwise available. Since the appellant could not avail the credit after the transition, the refund mechanism under section 142(3) was applicable. The issue of eligibility had already been considered in earlier decisions relied upon by the appellant. At the same time, the refund claim required factual verification on various aspects and could not be finally granted on the available record.
Conclusion: The appellant was held to be prima facie eligible for refund, but the matter was remitted for fresh consideration and scrutiny of the refund claim.