Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the complaint and supporting evidence could be amended to correct the year of the cheque from 2010 to 2012 in proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Analysis: The date of the cheque had been consistently reflected as 22.07.2010 in the statutory notice, the complaint, and the complainant's evidence. The proposed correction was sought at a late stage and would not merely cure a clerical error, because the cheque date was material to the statutory requirements governing notice and the cause of action in cheque dishonour proceedings. Permitting the correction would also leave the supporting evidence inconsistent with the amended pleading.
Conclusion: The amendment was not justified and ought not to have been allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: A correction that alters a materially significant cheque date in Section 138 proceedings cannot be permitted where the date has been consistently reflected in the statutory notice, complaint, and evidence, and where the change would affect the statutory foundation of the prosecution.