Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (12) TMI 1548 - HC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Condonation of delay and production warrants during investigation affirmed where strict limitation would defeat appellate remedy. The High Court treated the special appellate limitation clause as directory and held that delay beyond ninety days could be condoned on sufficient cause, ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Condonation of delay and production warrants during investigation affirmed where strict limitation would defeat appellate remedy.

                            The High Court treated the special appellate limitation clause as directory and held that delay beyond ninety days could be condoned on sufficient cause, preserving the appellate remedy in deserving cases. It further held that an order rejecting production warrants was not interlocutory because it finally determined an important procedural right affecting investigation, so an appeal lay. On production warrants, the Court read the phrase "other proceeding" broadly and held that warrants may be sought during investigation even where no trial or enquiry is pending before the Special Court; refusal solely on that ground was unsustainable.




                            Issues: (i) Whether the delay in filing the appeal beyond ninety days under the special appeal provision was condonable; (ii) whether the order rejecting production warrants was interlocutory and therefore not appealable; (iii) whether production warrants under the criminal procedure provision could be sought during investigation when no trial or enquiry was pending before the Special Court.

                            Issue (i): Whether the delay in filing the appeal beyond ninety days under the special appeal provision was condonable.

                            Analysis: The limitation clause in the special appeal provision was examined in the light of the Limitation Act and the competing views of different High Courts. The Court preferred the interpretation that the outer limit was not intended to extinguish the appellate remedy in deserving cases, especially where the right of appeal is linked to fair trial guarantees. The second proviso was treated as directory, not mandatory, and the High Court was held to retain discretion to condone delay on sufficient cause being shown.

                            Conclusion: The delay beyond ninety days was condonable and the application for condonation was maintainable, in favour of the appellant.

                            Issue (ii): Whether the order rejecting production warrants was interlocutory and therefore not appealable.

                            Analysis: An interlocutory order was understood as one that does not finally determine vital rights. The impugned order had the effect of terminating the request for production warrants and adversely affected the investigating agency's ability to proceed with the investigation. Since it determined an important procedural right and was not a mere step in an ongoing trial, it was held not to be interlocutory in character.

                            Conclusion: The order was not interlocutory and the appeal against it was maintainable, in favour of the appellant.

                            Issue (iii): Whether production warrants under the criminal procedure provision could be sought during investigation when no trial or enquiry was pending before the Special Court.

                            Analysis: The expression "other proceeding" in the production warrant provision was interpreted broadly, and the definition of investigation under the criminal procedure code was relied upon to hold that investigation forms part of proceedings for that purpose. The Court rejected the narrow view that production warrants could issue only when a case was pending trial or enquiry. It held that the Special Court could not refuse the request merely because no adjudicatory proceeding was pending, if the warrant was sought in aid of investigation and justice required the person's production.

                            Conclusion: Production warrants could be sought during investigation, and the refusal solely on the ground that no case was pending was unsustainable, in favour of the appellant.

                            Final Conclusion: The appellate court upheld the maintainability of the appeal, permitted delay condonation, and set aside the impugned order, directing fresh consideration of the request in accordance with law.

                            Ratio Decidendi: A special appellate limitation clause may be construed as directory where a strict mandatory reading would defeat the substantive right of appeal and fair trial, and the criminal procedure provision for production warrants extends to investigation as part of proceedings in aid of justice.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found