1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>ITAT Overturns Lower Authorities' Decisions, Rules Cash Deposit Additions During Demonetization Unjustified for A.Y. 2017-18.</h1> The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the decisions of the AO and CIT(A). The ITAT found the additions to the assessee's income, related to cash ... Unexplained income u/s 69A - assessee had deposited cash in the bank account - HELD THAT:- The amount as accepted as the turnover of the assessee and rest amount deposited Specified Bank Notes as unexplained income. AO has accepted the partial deposits made by the assessee as business turnover and rest as unexplained income without giving any reasons. The AO should have been given the reasons on what material the amount deposited in SBNs was the unexplained income of the assessee when the AO has accepted the amount of Rs 600000/- as his turnover the balance cash in SBNs should have also been accepted the turnover of the assessee. The assessee has discharged the onus that the transaction of the cash deposit was genuine. Assessee appeal allowed. The appeal was filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax for A.Y. 2017-18. The assessee deposited cash during demonetization. The Assessing Officer made additions to income, which the CIT(A) upheld. The ITAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authorities' orders.