Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Customs refund time limit starts from final assessment date, not provisional duty payment under Section 27(1B)(c)</h1> <h3>THE COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) Versus M/s SHITAL ISPAT PVT. LTD.</h3> Gujarat HC dismissed appeals regarding customs refund time limitation. Court held that one-year time limit under Notification 102/2007-Customs for refund ... Time limitation for filing refund - Interpretation of time limit for refund claim under Customs Act, 1962 based on provisional assessment and final assessment - time limit of one year from the date of payment of duty prescribed under N/N. 102/2007-Custom dated 14.09.2007 read with N/N. 93/2008 Customs dated 01.08.2008 for the refund claim filed in terms of the said notification, can be considered from the date of finalisation of provisional assessment (in cases where the assessment is provisional) or otherwise - whether the refund filed in the instant case is well within the time as prescribed under N/N. 102/2007-Cus and refund is not time barred? HELD THAT:- This Court in PIONEER INDIA ELECTRONICS (P) LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER [2013 (9) TMI 705 - DELHI HIGH COURT] has held that 'We are in complete agreement with the aforesaid observations of the Delhi High Court which is followed by the Tribunal to the effect that the date of making the refund application would be required to be considered from the date of final assessment and not from the date of payment of provisional duty as per the provisions of Section 27(1B)(c) of the Act and the reliance placed by the Revenue on the interpretations of the impugned Notification No.93/2008 cannot be applied contrary to the statutory provisions.' Thus, no question of law would arise from the impugned common order of the CESTAT and therefore, this appeals are accordingly dismissed. Issues:Interpretation of time limit for refund claim under Customs Act, 1962 based on provisional assessment and final assessment.Analysis:The High Court considered an appeal filed under section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, addressing common questions of law arising from a previous order by the Custom Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The primary issues revolved around the time limit for refund claims under Notification No. 102/2007-Custom and Noti. No. 93/2008 Customs. The first issue questioned whether the one-year time limit for refund claims should be calculated from the date of finalization of provisional assessment or otherwise. The second issue pertained to the correctness of the Tribunal's decision regarding the timeliness of the refund claim under the mentioned notifications.In a previous Tax Appeal, the Court had dismissed a similar issue, stating that no question of law arose from the CESTAT's order. The Court referred to Section 27(1B)(c) of the Act to determine the starting point for the one-year limitation period for refund claims, emphasizing that the limitation begins from the date of adjustment of duty after the final assessment in cases of provisional assessment. The Court highlighted that the Tribunal's interpretation aligned with statutory provisions and rejected the Revenue's reliance on the impugned Notification No. 93/2008.The Court also cited the decision of the Delhi High Court in a related case, emphasizing that the date of making the refund application should be considered from the date of final assessment, not the date of payment of provisional duty. The Court agreed with the Delhi High Court's interpretation, emphasizing that the Revenue's reliance on the impugned Notification was contrary to statutory provisions. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeals, concluding that no question of law arose from the CESTAT's order.Overall, the judgment clarified the interpretation of the time limit for refund claims under the Customs Act, highlighting the significance of final assessment in determining the starting point for the limitation period. The Court's analysis focused on harmonizing statutory provisions with the application of relevant notifications, emphasizing the need to adhere to the prescribed timelines for refund claims under the Customs Act, 1962.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found