Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned show cause notice was issued without jurisdiction and whether the absence of notice under Section 74(5) read with Section 74(8) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Rule 142(1A) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 warranted interim protection.
Analysis: The petition raised a jurisdictional objection to the show cause notice and pointed to the alleged non-issuance of the statutory notice under the GST provisions invoked. On that basis, notice was issued returnable for further hearing, and the Court granted limited ad-interim protection against passing of a final order during the pendency of the petition.
Outcome: Notice issued. The proceedings pursuant to the impugned show cause notice were permitted to continue, but no final order was to be passed without permission of the Court during the pendency of the petition.