Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer pricing adjustment made on account of corporate guarantee commission was sustainable.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that a corporate guarantee commission rate of 0.5% had been accepted in several decisions and that the assessee had already charged commission at the same rate from its associated enterprises. It also noticed that this rate compared favourably with the bank commission range referred to in the record. On those facts, the Tribunal held that the upward adjustment could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The transfer pricing adjustment on account of corporate guarantee commission was deleted and the finding was affirmed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the commission charged for a corporate guarantee is consistent with accepted Tribunal practice and supported by comparable factual material, an upward transfer pricing adjustment cannot be sustained merely on a different estimate of arm's length rate.