Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order could be sustained when objections against the draft assessment order had already been filed before the Dispute Resolution Panel and were pending consideration.
Analysis: The petitioner had filed objections to the draft assessment order under Section 144C(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and there was evidence that the Dispute Resolution Panel had received them. Although the assessee ought to have informed the assessing authority that objections had been filed, the assessment order was passed thereafter. The continuation of assessment proceedings while the objections remained pending before the Dispute Resolution Panel was held to cause serious prejudice, especially where transfer pricing variations were proposed.
Conclusion: The assessment order was not sustainable and was quashed. The assessing officer was directed to await the decision of the Dispute Resolution Panel before passing a fresh assessment order.