Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the upward adjustment made towards royalty and fees for technical services paid to the associated enterprise was tenable and whether the appeal deserved interference.
Analysis: The appeal concerned transfer pricing adjustments on royalty and technical fee payments. The Court noted that for subsequent assessment years the Department had accepted the aggregated approach, and that for Assessment Year 2010-11 similar adjustments had already been deleted by the Dispute Resolution Panel. It was also noted that the directions framed by the Dispute Resolution Panel under the governing statutory regime would bind the Assessing Officer. In these circumstances, the Court found no justification to entertain the appeal.
Conclusion: The upward adjustment was not interfered with in appeal and the challenge failed.