Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the company petition seeking winding up on the ground of inability to pay debts was maintainable and whether the dispute could be resolved by directions for payment and sale of the flat.
Analysis: The respondent showed that substantial payments had already been made and that the remaining liability could be worked out and discharged through a practical arrangement. The Court also took note of the bank's proceedings under the SARFAESI regime and the fact that the flat had already been subjected to action by the secured creditor. In these circumstances, the Court found it appropriate to avoid a bare dismissal and instead secure the interests of the petitioner, the respondent, and the bank by directing the respondent to enable sale of the apartment to a third party, with the sale proceeds to be applied first towards the bank's dues and the balance towards the petitioner's dues with interest.
Conclusion: The petition was disposed of with directions for sale of the apartment and distribution of sale proceeds towards the bank and the petitioner.