Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of the subsequent notification granting set-off of excise duty on inputs could be given retrospectively from 1 March 1986 in view of Section 2 of the Central Duties of Excise (Retrospective Exemption) Act, 1986.
Analysis: The Tribunal had applied the earlier decision in Jammu Bottling and held that the later notification issued on 3 April 1986 must operate from 1 March 1986. The Court noted that the earlier decision had already stood affirmed and that the present case was materially identical, the only difference being the date of the subsequent notification. On that basis, the reasoning adopted by the Tribunal was consistent with the governing precedent.
Conclusion: The retrospective benefit of the subsequent notification was available from 1 March 1986, and the appeal failed.