Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Company's share capital reduction petition approved under Section 101(1) after finding no creditor prejudice</h1> <h3>In Re. : M/s. Comtec Components Ltd.</h3> Madras HC approved a company's petition for reduction of share capital under Section 101(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found the decision was a ... Reduction of share capital account - Section 101(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 46 & 47 of the Companies (Court) Rules - HELD THAT:- As stated in the petition and as seen from the balance sheet filed, the decision taken as reduction of share capital is purely a commercial decision to have a true reflection of the financial position of the company. Considering the fact that such move has been approved by the overwhelming majority of the shareholders, apart from the fact that such reduction does not involve any cash out flow to prejudice the rights of the creditors, there are no impediment in granting the relief prayed for herein. Consequently, this petition seeking approval to the resolution passed is hereby granted. Clause (a) of sub Section (2) of Section 102 of the Companies Act, 1956, provides that the Court may, for any special reason, if it thinks proper so to do, direct the company to add the words “and reduced” to its name on the last words thereof during the period commencing from the date of the Court’s order till such time as the court specifies in its order. The purpose of such inclusion is only to put on notice the investing public the state of affairs of the company and that it has gone for reduction of the capital - Taking note of the circumstances warranting the course for reduction of capital, there being no cash outflow or for any creditor to object, the procedure laid down under Section 100 fully complied with, there is no impediment in granting the prayer confirming the reduction of capital as resolved by the company in its special resolution dated 21.10.2013 confirmed so as to be binding on all the shareholders and creditors of the petitioner company. The words “and reduced” pursuant to the reduction approved, is dispensed with. In the light of the above-said facts, the prayer sought for herein is granted. The petition is ordered to the effect that approving the resolution passed on 21.10.2013 for the reduction of the share capital to Rs. 5,00,000/- divided into 50,000 equity shares of Rs. 10/- each fully paid up and dispensed with the words “and reduced” pursuant to the reduction. Issues:Reduction of share capital under Companies Act, 1956.Analysis:1. Background and Petition Details:The petition seeks confirmation for the reduction of share capital under Section 101(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. The company's share capital is proposed to be reduced from Rs. 44,95,000 to Rs. 5,00,000 by extinguishing a specific number of equity shares. The company's main objects and the relevant resolutions by the Board of Directors and shareholders are presented in the petition.2. Shareholders' Approval and Meeting Resolutions:The Extra-Ordinary General Body Meeting held on 21.10.2013 saw unanimous approval of the special resolution for the reduction of capital. The resolution detailed the reduction process and the adjustment of the debit balance in the Profit and Loss Account. The company's financial position post-reduction is emphasized to provide a more accurate representation.3. Financial Position and Creditor Interests:The company's financial statements are expected to reflect a more realistic picture post-reduction, with no impact on the company's operations or ability to meet its commitments. The absence of secured or unsecured creditors ensures no adverse effect on creditor interests due to the reduction.4. Regional Director's Report and Commercial Decision:The Regional Director's report supports the reduction proposal, highlighting the absence of objections or secured creditors. The decision to reduce share capital is deemed a commercial choice to accurately depict the company's financial standing, supported by the majority shareholder approval.5. Court Approval and Compliance:The Court, after considering the circumstances and compliance with Section 100 provisions, grants approval for the reduction of capital as per the special resolution dated 21.10.2013. The inclusion of the words 'and reduced' in the company's name is dispensed with, ensuring the reduction is binding on all shareholders and creditors.6. Final Order and Relief Granted:The petition is ordered to approve the resolution for the reduction of share capital to Rs. 5,00,000, divided into 50,000 equity shares, fully paid up. The dispensation of the words 'and reduced' post-reduction is confirmed, concluding the relief sought in the petition.This detailed analysis covers the legal judgment regarding the reduction of share capital under the Companies Act, 1956, highlighting the key aspects and decisions made by the Court in this matter.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found