Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment order passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was sustainable when it was made before the expiry of the time granted for response to the show-cause notice and the assessee could not file objections due to technical glitches in the e-filing portal.
Analysis: The order was passed before the time granted for filing reply had expired. The record also showed that the assessee was unable to submit objections because of technical difficulties in the Department's portal. In these circumstances, the assessment order was inconsistent with the requirement of fair opportunity and observance of natural justice.
Conclusion: The assessment order was not sustainable in law, was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after granting the assessee an opportunity to file a reply and for passing a reasoned order in accordance with law.