Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Official Liquidator ordered to pay outstanding security charges to agencies who protected company assets during liquidation proceedings</h1> Gujarat HC directed Official Liquidator to disburse outstanding security charges to applicants who provided security services for company in liquidation. ... Direction to disburse outstanding amount of security charges to the applicant - HELD THAT:- It is clear from the record that the Official Liquidator, in pursuance to the direction given by this Court, appointed the security agencies from time to time. The said security agencies have deployed security guards for protecting the assets and properties of the company in liquidation. The said security agencies raised their bills from time to time. However, the amount is not paid to the concerned security agencies in view of the various disputes and litigations pending before this Court with regard to the theft of the properties and assets of the company in liquidation. It is further revealed from the record that this Court appointed GITCO for assessing the loss caused to the assets of the company in liquidation because of the theft and GITCO has submitted its report. The Official Liquidator has not paid the security charges to the applicant of Company Application No.242 of 2012 for the period between 2003 to 2008 and the applicant of Company Application No.40 of 2014 for the period between May, 2008 to March, 2009. Thus, now as per the last report filed by the Official Liquidator on 20.3.2015 and as per the documents produced at pages no.346 and 347 of the compilation, the outstanding amount is required to be paid to the concerned applicant. Hence, these applications are required to be considered and hence the following order: (1) The Official Liquidator is directed/permitted to pay an amount of Rs. 53,84,647/- as per the statement produced at page no.346 to the applicant of Company Application No.242 of 2012 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of this order by RTGS. (2) The Official Liquidator shall make the payment of Rs. 7,49,070/- to Dy. Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Makarpura Division, Vadodara-II instead of the applicant of Company Application No.40 of 2014 as per the communication dated 5.2.2014 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the order by RTGS. Application disposed off. Issues:1. Outstanding security charges payment to the applicant by the Official Liquidator.Detailed Analysis:The judgment involves two applications filed by the concerned applicants seeking direction for the Official Liquidator to disburse outstanding security charges. The applicants were appointed as security agencies for safeguarding the assets of a company in liquidation. The Official Liquidator failed to make payments for security expenses, leading to disputes and litigations. The Court appointed GITCO to assess losses caused to the company's assets due to theft, and the valuer's reports indicated the amount of liability of each applicant for the theft losses.In the first application, the applicant was appointed as a security agency from 2003 to 2008. The total security charges amounted to Rs. 68,28,362, out of which only Rs. 12,43,960 was paid. The theft loss quantified by GITCO was Rs. 1,99,755. Therefore, the balance amount of Rs. 53,84,647 was directed to be paid to the applicant within three weeks via RTGS.In the second application, the applicant served as a security agency from May 2008 to March 2009. The security charges totaled Rs. 9,28,470, with no payment made. The theft loss quantified was Rs. 1,79,400. Thus, the balance amount of Rs. 7,49,070 was directed to be paid to the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs, and Service Tax within three weeks via RTGS.The judgment highlighted that the Official Liquidator had funds of approximately Rs. 81 lakhs in the company's account, and it was directed to consider paying the outstanding bills of the security agencies after adjusting the loss of assets as per GITCO's valuation reports. The Court emphasized the need to settle the outstanding amounts owed to the security agencies based on the latest reports and documents presented. The judgment concluded with the directives for payment to the respective applicants and the disposal of the applications.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found