Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported stainless steel rolled special blade sections were classifiable under Tariff Heading 73.15(1) or Tariff Heading 73.15(2) in the light of Public Notice No. 56/78 dated July 19, 1978.
Analysis: The governing public notice required that alloy steel be known in the trade as stainless steel and also contain more than 11% chromium before it could be treated as stainless steel for customs classification. The use of the word "and" made both conditions cumulative, and the notice could not be read as covering two separate categories merely because one of them was trade understanding and the other chromium content. On the facts found, even assuming trade recognition as stainless steel, the imported goods did not satisfy the chromium-content condition.
Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable as stainless steel under Tariff Heading 73.15(2) and fell under Tariff Heading 73.15(1); the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.