2014 (3) TMI 1233 - HC - Companies Law

Gujarat HC approves company amalgamation scheme under Sections 391-394 benefiting shareholders creditors and public interest

The Gujarat HC sanctioned a scheme of amalgamation under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the amalgamation scheme was in ... Sanction of Scheme of Amalgamation - Sections 391 to 394, read with Section 100 and other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 - HELD THAT:- The present Scheme of Amalgamation is in the interest of the shareholder and creditors of the petitioner Company as well as in the public interest and the same deserves to be sanctioned - The reduction of share capital of the petitioner Company as envisaged in the petition is approved and the Minute dealing with reduction of the share capital of the petitioner Company being Annexure V is hereby approved. The petition is disposed off. Issues Involved:1. Sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies.2. Reduction of share capital of the petitioner company.3. Compliance with statutory requirements and objections raised by the Regional Director.4. Objections raised by shareholders.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation:The petitioner company sought the court's approval for a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Scheme involved the amalgamation of the entire undertaking of the Transferor Company into the petitioner Company, the reduction of capital, and the dissolution of the Transferor Company without winding up. The court directed the holding of meetings for equity shareholders, while meetings for secured and unsecured creditors were dispensed with. The Scheme was approved by a requisite majority of equity shareholders and public shareholders through postal ballot and e-voting, as required by SEBI Circulars. The court found that the amalgamation was in the interest of shareholders, creditors, and the public, and thus sanctioned the Scheme.2. Reduction of Share Capital:The Scheme included the cancellation of 15,06,70,120 equity shares held by the Transferor Company in the petitioner Company. This cancellation was to occur without any further act, as per the provisions of Sections 100 to 103 of the Act. A special resolution was passed by the petitioner Company approving the reduction in capital. The court approved the reduction of share capital as envisaged in the petition and sanctioned the corresponding Minute.3. Compliance with Statutory Requirements and Objections Raised by the Regional Director:The Regional Director raised several observations, including issues related to the issuance of shares in dematerialized form, compliance with Accounting Standard 14, adherence to SEBI Circulars, treatment of employees, and financial arrangements under the Scheme. The petitioner Company addressed these observations in its affidavit, agreeing to comply with statutory requirements and modify the Scheme if directed by the court. The court was satisfied that the observations did not warrant withholding the sanction of the Scheme.4. Objections Raised by Shareholders:One shareholder, Mr. Dipakkumar J. Shah, raised objections, but these were not formally filed with the court. The petitioner Company responded to the objections in an affidavit, and the court found no merit in these objections to impede the sanctioning of the Scheme. Another shareholder, Ms. Chandiramani Rekha Mohan, had raised concerns but did not pursue them further in court. The court, referencing the Apex Court's observations in a similar case, determined that the objections did not present any legal lacuna and thus overruled them.Conclusion:The court concluded that the Scheme of Amalgamation was in the interest of the shareholders, creditors, and public, and approved the reduction of share capital. The petitioner Company was directed to comply with procedural requirements, including filing and publishing notices as per the court's directions. The petition was disposed of with costs awarded to the Central Government's Standing Counsel.