Bail cancellation in murder cases requires strict scrutiny of gravity, antecedents, witness risk, and fair-trial concerns.

Bail in murder prosecutions must be assessed on settled factors including the prima facie case, gravity of the charge, likely punishment, risk of absconding, repetition of offence, and the possibility of witness tampering. Where eyewitness statements implicate the accused and the record shows serious criminal antecedents, a later bail order cannot rest mainly on custody, delay in trial, or non-misuse of temporary bail. An order that effectively pre-judges the merits is improper in a heinous offence because it can undermine a fair trial. On this reasoning, the grant of bail was held unjustified and the bail orders were liable to be cancelled.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the orders granting bail in murder cases, involving serious allegations, witness statements implicating the accused, and adverse antecedents, were liable to be set aside and bail cancelled.

Issue (i): Whether the orders granting bail in murder cases, involving serious allegations, witness statements implicating the accused, and adverse antecedents, were liable to be set aside and bail cancelled.

Analysis: Bail in a grave offence like murder must be tested on settled considerations such as the existence of a prima facie case, the nature and gravity of the charge, the severity of punishment, the possibility of absconding, the likelihood of repeating the offence, and the risk of tampering with witnesses or obstructing justice. The earlier rejection of bail had proceeded on the seriousness of the accusations and the material on record, while the later grant of bail relied chiefly on custody, non-commencement of trial, and the fact that temporary bail had not been misused. Those grounds were held insufficient, especially where the accused had serious criminal antecedents and the later order entered into an undue appreciation of merits as if deciding the case finally. The record also showed statements of eyewitnesses naming the accused and the need to protect a fair trial in a heinous offence.

Conclusion: The grant of bail was not justified and the bail orders were liable to be cancelled.

---