Quantity discount remanded, bank charges allowed, and damage discount rejected in a mixed tax outcome.

Quantity discount required fresh consideration because the record was insufficient, so that issue was set aside and remitted for reconsideration with liberty to adduce fresh evidence. Bank charges were allowable in the assessee's favour because the point was covered by the binding decision relied upon by the Court, and the assessee succeeded on that issue. Damage discount was not allowable on the facts and in light of the governing decisions, so the deduction claim was rejected. The appeals therefore succeeded only in part, with one issue remanded, one allowed for the assessee, and one disallowed.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the claim relating to quantity discount required fresh consideration; (ii) whether bank charges were allowable in the assessee's favour; and (iii) whether the assessee was entitled to damage discount.

Issue (i): whether the claim relating to quantity discount required fresh consideration.

Analysis: The parties were in agreement that the matter relating to quantity discount should not be finally decided on the existing record. The appropriate course was to set aside the impugned order to that extent and remit the issue for reconsideration in accordance with law, with liberty to adduce fresh evidence.

Conclusion: The issue of quantity discount was remanded for fresh decision.

Issue (ii): whether bank charges were allowable in the assessee's favour.

Analysis: The issue was covered by the binding decision relied upon by the Court in favour of the assessee.

Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the issue of bank charges and the appeals were dismissed to that extent.

Issue (iii): whether the assessee was entitled to damage discount.

Analysis: On the facts and in light of the governing decisions referred to, the Court held that the assessee was not entitled to deduction on account of damages.

Conclusion: The claim for damage discount was rejected.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded only in part, with one issue remitted for fresh adjudication, one issue decided in favour of the assessee, and the claim for damage discount disallowed.

---