Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to provisional release of the detained xerox machine and whether the customs authority should be directed to take a decision and permit release on compliance of specified conditions.
Analysis: The writ petition complained of inaction by the customs authority on the petitioner's request for provisional release. Considering the facts and submissions, the Court directed the Commissioner of Customs to intimate the additional customs duty payable within the stipulated time. The petitioner was required to pay the duty within seven days of such intimation and furnish a bank guarantee for 10% of the total price of the imported goods. On compliance of these formalities, the customs authority was directed to release the goods within ten days. The directions were stated to be without prejudice to the rights of the parties in any subsequent proceedings.
Conclusion: Provisional release of the detained goods was directed in favour of the petitioner, subject to payment of the indicated additional customs duty and furnishing of a bank guarantee.