Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment made under section 143(3) was invalid for want of a valid notice under section 143(2) issued by the officer having jurisdiction over the assessee's case.
Analysis: The assessment was framed by the Assessing Officer without issuing the statutory notice under section 143(2) from the officer who had jurisdiction over the case. The objection went to the root of the assumption of jurisdiction and was not a mere irregularity. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on identical facts and held that where the notice under section 143(2) is not issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer within the prescribed framework, the resulting assessment cannot be sustained. The challenge under section 124(3) did not save the assessment because the defect concerned the very competence to assume jurisdiction for framing the assessment.
Conclusion: The assessment was quashed for want of valid jurisdiction and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A scrutiny assessment is invalid where the statutory notice under section 143(2) is not issued by the officer having jurisdiction to assess the case, because valid service of such notice by the competent officer is essential to assume jurisdiction under section 143(3).