GST detention and confiscation procedure: interim release granted while the Section 129 and Section 130 issue remains pending.

Whether proceedings under Section 129 of the Karnataka GST Act must precede confiscation proceedings under Section 130 is treated as a contested procedural issue, with one side asserting sequential dependence and the other maintaining that the remedies are independent and mutually exclusive. The petition was directed for further consideration, and pending final hearing the court ordered interim release of the goods and conveyance on deposit of Rs. 4 lakhs, subject to the petition's final outcome. The document therefore records an interim arrangement rather than a final determination on the interaction between Sections 129 and 130.

---

---

Issues: Whether proceedings under Section 129 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 must be completed before initiation of confiscation proceedings under Section 130 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and whether interim release of the goods and conveyance should be granted pending consideration of the petition.

Analysis: The petition raised the contention that initiation of proceedings under Section 129 had to precede confiscation proceedings under Section 130, while the respondents maintained that the two proceedings are independent and mutually exclusive. The matter was directed to be listed in the B group for further consideration. In the meantime, an interim arrangement was made for release of the goods and conveyance on deposit of Rs. 4 lakhs, subject to the final outcome of the petition.

Outcome: Interim release of the subject goods and conveyance was ordered on deposit of Rs. 4 lakhs, and the petition remained pending for final hearing.

---