Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Orders Arbitration for Dispute; Plaintiff Gets Court Fee Refund.</h1> The High Court of Delhi directed the recovery suit to arbitration pursuant to Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, acknowledging the ... Suit for recovery together with pendente lite and future interest - prayer for discharge of its bank guarantees - Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - HELD THAT:- The plaintiff states that he has no objection to the matter being referred to the Arbitration provided the Court-fees paid in the present suit is refunded. Consequently, with consent of parties, this Court refers the parties to the Arbitration. Accordingly, present suit stands disposed of. The High Court of Delhi referred a recovery suit to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to the presence of an arbitration clause in the contract. The plaintiff agreed to arbitration on the condition that court fees paid would be refunded. The suit was disposed of with parties' consent, and the plaintiff was directed to receive a refund of court fees from the Collector.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
