1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court Orders Arbitration for Dispute; Plaintiff Gets Court Fee Refund.</h1> The High Court of Delhi directed the recovery suit to arbitration pursuant to Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, acknowledging the ... Suit for recovery together with pendente lite and future interest - prayer for discharge of its bank guarantees - Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - HELD THAT:- The plaintiff states that he has no objection to the matter being referred to the Arbitration provided the Court-fees paid in the present suit is refunded. Consequently, with consent of parties, this Court refers the parties to the Arbitration. Accordingly, present suit stands disposed of. The High Court of Delhi referred a recovery suit to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to the presence of an arbitration clause in the contract. The plaintiff agreed to arbitration on the condition that court fees paid would be refunded. The suit was disposed of with parties' consent, and the plaintiff was directed to receive a refund of court fees from the Collector.