Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 10(26AAB) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the additions made in the reassessment deserved to be restored.
Analysis: The assessee was found to be an agricultural produce market committee constituted under the Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1956 for regulating the marketing of agricultural produce, and the appellate finding granting exemption under section 10(26AAB) was not displaced by the Revenue. The record also showed that the assessee had faced technical difficulty in responding to the assessment notices, a fact noticed by the first appellate authority and not effectively controverted.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the exemption, and the deletion of the additions was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: When the factual foundation for a statutory exemption is recorded by the first appellate authority and remains unrebutted, interference in the Revenue appeal is unwarranted.