Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cancellation of GST registration for non-filing of returns, coupled with the petitioner's inability to pursue the statutory appeal within limitation, warranted interference under writ jurisdiction and restoration of registration.
Analysis: The petitioner's registration had been cancelled for non-filing of returns. The Court noted the pleaded hardship that GST registration was necessary to continue business and that the statutory appellate remedy had become unavailable because of limitation. Relying on the principle that GST provisions should not be interpreted to deny the constitutional right to carry on trade and livelihood, and following earlier decisions permitting revival of cancelled registrations subject to compliance, the Court found it appropriate to exercise writ jurisdiction. The Court also observed that small traders may not effectively respond to cancellation notices and that the object of the tax regime is to facilitate, not stifle, legitimate trade while ensuring compliance through returns, tax payment, and other safeguards.
Conclusion: The cancellation order was set aside and the petitioner was permitted to restore compliance by filing returns within the time granted by the Court.
Ratio Decidendi: In appropriate cases, cancellation of GST registration for procedural default may be interfered with in writ jurisdiction where denial of restoration would unjustly impair the right to carry on trade and livelihood, provided the defaulting assessee is given an opportunity to regularise compliance.