Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a delayed GST appeal rejected by the appellate authority could be restored and permitted to be considered on merits in view of the statutory scheme and the later notification extending the time for filing appeals under sections 73 and 74.
Analysis: The time prescribed under section 107 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 permits an appeal within three months, with a further condonable period of one month on satisfactory explanation. The Court reiterated that, outside the period expressly allowed by statute, delay cannot be condoned by the appellate authority or under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It also noticed Notification No. 53/2023-Central Tax dated 02.11.2023, which extended the time for filing appeals against orders passed on or before 31.03.2023 under sections 73 and 74 and provided a special procedure, including payment of the admitted dues and 12.5% of the disputed tax, along with other stipulated conditions. Since the appeal had been rejected and the notification enabled restoration subject to compliance, the Court found it to set aside the rejection and permit the assessee to satisfy the notification conditions within the prescribed time.
Conclusion: The delayed appeal was directed to be restored and treated as maintainable if the notification conditions were fulfilled by 31.01.2024; failing compliance, the rejection would revive.