Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the blocking of input tax credit under Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 was justified on the ground that the registered place of business was not functioning and the assessee failed to establish actual business activity there.
Analysis: The blocking of input tax credit was founded on an enforcement enquiry that found the business premises not functioning at the registered address. The assessee was given an to produce documents showing actual physical occupation and conduct of business, but the materials produced did not establish such occupation or activity. The electricity record also indicated nil consumption for the relevant month. Though no explanation had been sought before issuing the blocking communication, the subsequent opportunity afforded before the Court cured any practical prejudice, and the assessee still failed to dislodge the factual basis for the action.
Conclusion: The blocking of input tax credit under Rule 86A was upheld and the request for remand was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed, with liberty left open to seek credit for a future period in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Input tax credit may be blocked under Rule 86A where the authority has a reason to believe that the registered premises are not being used for actual business, and the Court will not interfere when the assessee fails to produce material showing genuine occupation and at the registered place.