TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Delayed Appeal Filing Deemed Valid Due to Improper Order Communication, Emphasizing Procedural Fairness and Substantial Justice</h1> <h3>M/s. STEEL KART Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER</h3> HC upheld the writ petition, ruling that the appeal filing deadline is directory, not mandatory. The court directed the appellant authority to consider ... Mainatianbility of appeal - the petitioner has already paid the pre-deposit for hearing of the appeal - HELD THAT:- In the present case, since the order passed itself was not brought to the knowledge of the petitioner herein, the period as prescribed under Section 35(1) of the Act has to be read from the date of knowledge and nor from the date of passing of the order alone. The appellant authority is directed to consider the appeal of the petitioner on merits without going into the question of delay/ limitation - petition allowed. The High Court allowed the Writ Petition, directing the appellant authority to consider the appeal on merits without considering the delay. The court held that the provision for filing an appeal within a specific period is directory, not mandatory, especially when the order was not conveyed to the petitioner.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
