Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in declining to make a reference to the High Court on the questions relating to eligibility of high speed diesel oil as input and allowability of Modvat credit under the Central Excise regime.
Analysis: The Court found that the Tribunal ought not to have refused reference. The questions proposed involved the treatment of high speed diesel oil as an input within the scheme of Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and the availability of Modvat credit in respect of goods falling under Heading No. 27.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Since the matter required reference on the framed questions, the Tribunal's refusal was held to be erroneous.
Conclusion: The refusal to make a reference was set aside and the Tribunal was directed to refer the stated questions to the High Court.