Reassessment notices under section 148 for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15 issued after time limit declared invalid

The Gujarat HC held that reassessment notices under section 148 for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15 issued between April-June 2021 were time-barred and without jurisdiction. The court ruled that the six-year limitation period from the old regime continued to apply, making notices issued beyond March 2020 (for AY 2013-14) and March 2021 (for AY 2014-15) invalid. The HC rejected the Revenue's reliance on CBDT notifications extending time limits, holding that secondary legislation cannot override principal legislation. All such notices were declared illegal and beyond the permissible timeline.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Legality and jurisdiction of notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for reopening assessments for the years 2013-14 and 2014-15.
2. Applicability of the time limit for issuing such notices as per the old regime and the new regime introduced by the Finance Act, 2021.
3. Impact of the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal on the validity of the notices.
4. Relevance of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, in extending the time limit for issuing notices.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Legality and Jurisdiction of Notices:

The core issue revolves around the legality of notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for reopening assessments for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15. The petitioners challenged these notices on the grounds of being time-barred, as they were issued beyond the permissible time limit of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The court noted that these notices, issued after the expiration of six years, are illegal and without jurisdiction.

2. Applicability of Time Limit:

The judgment delves into the time limits set by the old and new regimes for issuing notices under Section 148. Under the old regime, notices could be issued within four to six years from the end of the relevant assessment year, provided the income that escaped assessment exceeded one lakh rupees. The Finance Act, 2021, introduced a new regime effective from 01.04.2021, reducing the time limit to three years, extendable to ten years if the escaped income exceeds fifty lakh rupees. However, the court emphasized that the first proviso to Section 149 of the new regime stipulates that notices cannot be issued for assessment years beginning on or before 01.04.2021 if they were time-barred under the old regime.

3. Impact of Supreme Court's Decision:

The Supreme Court's decision in Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal played a pivotal role in this case. The Supreme Court had ruled that notices issued between 01.04.2021 and 30.06.2021 under the old regime should be treated as show-cause notices under Section 148A(b) of the new regime. However, the Supreme Court also clarified that all defenses available under Section 149 of the Finance Act, 2021, and in law, would remain available. The Gujarat High Court, relying on this decision, concluded that the notices in question were still time-barred as per the old regime and could not be revived under the new regime.

4. Relevance of the Taxation and Other Laws Act, 2020:

The court examined the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, which extended timelines due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it was held that this Act, being secondary legislation, could not override the principal legislation of the Finance Act, 2021. The court rejected the argument that the extended timelines under this Act could legitimize the otherwise time-barred notices.

Conclusion:

The court allowed the petitions, setting aside the impugned notices and orders under Section 148 and 148A(d) for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15. The court held that these notices were issued beyond the permissible time limit and were therefore illegal and without jurisdiction. All other factual and legal issues were left open for consideration in future proceedings.

---