Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1978 (10) TMI 51 - HC - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court orders probation instead of imprisonment for smuggling gold biscuits; confiscation order overturned. The accused was convicted under Section 135(b)(ii) of the Customs Act for dealing with smuggled gold biscuits. However, instead of imprisonment, the court ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Court orders probation instead of imprisonment for smuggling gold biscuits; confiscation order overturned.

                            The accused was convicted under Section 135(b)(ii) of the Customs Act for dealing with smuggled gold biscuits. However, instead of imprisonment, the court ordered probation for two years considering the long duration since the offence and the accused's age at the time. The order confiscating the gold biscuits to the State of Rajasthan was overturned, directing their return to the Central Government.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Reasonable belief for seizure under Section 123 of the Customs Act.
                            2. Burden of proof regarding smuggled goods.
                            3. Applicability of Section 135(b) of the Customs Act.
                            4. Confiscation of gold biscuits.
                            5. Sentencing and probation.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Reasonable Belief for Seizure under Section 123 of the Customs Act:
                            The primary issue was whether the seizure of gold biscuits from the accused was made under a "reasonable belief" that the goods were smuggled. The prosecution argued that the information received by the customs officer about the accused bringing smuggled gold from Bombay constituted a reasonable belief. The court noted that the officer had prior information specifically about smuggled gold, and the seizure memo clearly mentioned the reasons for recovery. Thus, it was held that the seizure was made under a reasonable belief that the gold was smuggled.

                            2. Burden of Proof Regarding Smuggled Goods:
                            Under Section 123 of the Customs Act, once goods are seized under the reasonable belief that they are smuggled, the burden of proof shifts to the accused to prove that the goods are not smuggled. The court found that the prosecution had established the reasonable belief required for the seizure, thereby shifting the burden to the accused. The accused failed to discharge this burden, as he denied the recovery of gold biscuits from his possession and provided no credible evidence to prove that the goods were not smuggled.

                            3. Applicability of Section 135(b) of the Customs Act:
                            Section 135(b) pertains to dealing with goods that one knows or has reason to believe are liable to confiscation under Section 111. The court examined whether the accused had knowledge or reason to believe that the gold biscuits were smuggled. Given the foreign markings on the gold biscuits and the circumstances of their recovery, the court concluded that the accused, being a saraf (goldsmith), was aware that the gold was smuggled. Therefore, the court held that the accused was guilty under Section 135(b)(ii) of the Customs Act.

                            4. Confiscation of Gold Biscuits:
                            The trial court had ordered the confiscation of the gold biscuits to the State of Rajasthan. However, the appellate court noted that the gold biscuits had already been confiscated by the Customs authority and vested in the Central Government under Section 126 of the Act. Consequently, the order of confiscation to the State of Rajasthan was set aside, and it was directed that the gold biscuits be returned to the Central Government through the competent Customs officer.

                            5. Sentencing and Probation:
                            The court considered the appropriate sentence for the accused. Although the offence was serious, the court took into account the long duration since the offence (nearly 13 years) and the age of the accused (about 17 years at the time of the offence). The court also considered the reformative approach under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. Instead of sentencing the accused to imprisonment, the court directed that he be released on probation for two years, with a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bhilwara.

                            Conclusion:
                            The appeal was accepted, and the accused was convicted under Section 135(b)(ii) of the Customs Act. He was released on probation instead of being sentenced to imprisonment. The order of confiscation of the gold biscuits to the State of Rajasthan was set aside, and the gold biscuits were directed to be returned to the Central Government through the competent Customs officer.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found