Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for reversing CENVAT credit attributable to common input services used in manufacture of dutiable goods and taxable and exempted services, the amount under Rule 6(3A)(c)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is to be computed by taking common CENVAT credit or total CENVAT credit in the numerator.
Analysis: The issue had already been settled by earlier Tribunal decisions and was treated as no longer res integra. The same Bench had also decided the appellants' own case in their favour by following the ratio of Chennai Petroleum Corporation Ltd., and the Department had not shown any contrary binding decision.
Conclusion: The appellants were in taking common CENVAT credit in the numerator instead of total CENVAT credit, and the demand could not be sustained.